Reading time: 4\u20135 minutes<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n The HIV virus spread rapidly and caused panic among the population in Flanders. Several countries launched prevention campaigns to prevent the number of infections from spiralling out of control. Such campaigns focused mainly on the principal means of prevention for HIV: the condom. A contraceptive that Catholic Flanders viewed with considerable distaste. <\/span>At the time there was still a strong tendency to push contraception into a dark corner, often rooted in outdated Catholic views. Sex was considered legitimate only when directed toward procreation\u2014everything beyond that was regarded as sinful. This was already an obstacle in itself, but the fact that the disease initially affected mainly homosexual men generated even more resistance.<\/span><\/p>\n Just when it seemed that homosexuals were beginning to integrate more fully into society, the epidemic pushed the community backwards again. AIDS was seen as a disease spread by the \u201cobjectively disordered,\u201d as described in the Catechism of the Catholic Church (see paragraphs 2357\u20132359). <\/span>Many questions arose concerning the acceptability of homosexuality, because it was supposedly \u2018the cause\u2019 of the disease. Many people interpreted the epidemic as a punishment or revenge from God. <\/span>That was deeply confronting: genuine love was supposedly wrong, and if you gave in to it, you would be punished.<\/span><\/p>\n Among the AIDS patients I met in my practice, I often noticed deep shame. They experienced conflicts with their families and struggled with guilt and fear simply because they had contracted a disease surrounded by enormous taboo. <\/span>But the difficulties were not limited to their private lives.\u00a0<\/span>Within the healthcare system itself I witnessed things that left me speechless. Many doctors and healthcare workers were afraid to treat AIDS patients for fear of infection. Some tried to avoid providing care, made treatment difficult, or implicitly blamed patients for their illness.<\/span><\/p>\n This attitude was rooted in a society permeated by conservative Catholic thinking. In the 1980s Flanders was strongly pillarized: between 1950 and 2000 the Christian Democratic Party (CVP, now CD&V) participated in every government. That translated into enormous resistance to campaigns promoting condoms as a preventive measure. <\/span>Every attempt in that direction met opposition from Catholic circles. <\/span>And yet, looking back today, I also see another side: the great willingness of many people who, despite everything, chose to help and protect others.<\/span><\/p>\n Whenever a new and unknown disease appears, panic inevitably arises. People talk over one another, conspiracy theories emerge, and someone must be blamed. Fear feeds judgment. <\/span>If the disease is linked to subjects such as sex or homosexuality, the reaction becomes even stronger. The AIDS outbreak offered the Church an opportunity to portray homosexuality as the \u201cgreat sin.\u201d Many believers took this literally. <\/span>Fortunately, the 1980s also contained another reality: solidarity and progress. A large part of society eventually responded in a humane and meaningful way. <\/span>The Church, by contrast, began to fragment\u2014and not without reason. Its reaction to the epidemic was, objectively speaking, misguided.<\/span><\/p>\nFlanders versus the condom<\/h3>\n
Panic reactions and misconceptions<\/h3>\n
Fighting AIDS together<\/h3>\n